Ruby Capistrano is dead - use Mina

scmroad · 发布于 2013年06月24日 · 155 次阅读
96

Capistrano is dead - use Mina

Raphael Randschau

Up until lately I was happy using Capistrano for my deployments. But then I noticed the following:

Capistrano was utilizing 70 % of a physical CPU core when deploying on the go.

I'm on a dual core system so this impacts my Mac Book Pros overall performance, battery life and it kept me waiting for a long long time. My iPhone was at edge speed so I figured Capistrano spent most of the time waiting for network I\O - busy waiting that is.

So I profiled Capistrano using perftools.rb. Capistrano spent about 50% on Compat.io_select over each deployment run. That's 50 % of a total of 40 seconds it took to deploy & restart my application server. The percentage spent waiting on Compact.io_select decreases to about 10% as the network speed increases to regular DSL levels.

The interesting part is that this is just CPU time. When profiling wall time Compact.io_select is at 9%, while Object#process_iteration is at 84%. Object#process_iteration is a wrapper Capistrano introduces around Kernel#select which 'should' not do busy waiting. But Capistrano kept my CPU busy anyways.

I converted my Capistrano configuration to Mina to see if it was any better.

Contrary to Capistrano Mina creates a Bash script based on your deployment configuration and executes the script on the server side using a single SSH connection. In theory this should be way faster than Capistrano which creates multiple SSH connections. It should have a far smaller CPU footprint as well given that Ruby is only used to assemble a Bash script.

Timing both setups led to the following results:

$ time mina deploy real 0m23.999s user 0m0.188s sys 0m0.054s

$ time cap deploy real 0m40.561s user 0m0.897s sys 0m0.191s As you can see Mina deployments take about half the time it takes Capistrano to deploy and it didn't use much CPU.

For comparison only, here's a stripped-down version of my Capistrano configuration

Mina is faster than capistrano, uses less CPU and less network bandwidth. Since it generates a bash script for deployment it's also much more transparent what's going on and how to change it to act the way you want it to. Verdict:

Use Mina already!

暂无回复。
需要 登录 后方可回复, 如果你还没有账号请点击这里 注册